🔗 Share this article

You're probably familiar with the Hitchcock classic, The Silence of the Lambs, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Maybe you've even read the original novels that served as the basis for the first two films. Now prepare to meet the man behind Norman Bates, Buffalo Bill, and the chainsaw-wielding villain. The one and only Ed Gein!

The first two seasons of the series in question centered around Jeffrey Dahmer – an individual possessing widespread notoriety. Then came the sibling duo – a more niche story for enthusiasts of the genre. Attention now shifts to the Plainfield Ghoul. Although he doesn't possess the brand recognition of other notorious killers, and his confirmed victims number just two, his grave desecrations and macabre artistry with female corpses have left a lasting mark. To this day, any film or show featuring dismembered remains, flayed skin, or skin-based artifacts probably owes a debt to Gein's exploits from many decades past.

A Tone of Flippancy

Is my tone too casual? This appears to be the deliberate approach of the creators. Rarely have I seen a drama that dwells so eagerly on the worst depredations a person – and mankind – can commit. This includes a significant plotline devoted to Nazi atrocities, presented with little to no justification.

Structural and Stylistic Strengths

In terms of construction and style, the show is impressive. The pacing is flawless, and the skillful blending of different timelines is executed brilliantly. We see the actor as Gein committing his crimes – the homicides, grave robberies, and curating his gruesome trophies. In parallel, the present-day narrative follows the creative minds as they develop Psycho from Bloch's Gein-inspired novel. The blending of factual elements – his devout parent and his obsession with women resembling her – and the unreal – lurid portrayals of the Buchenwald criminal and Nazi party scenes – is executed proficiently.

The Glaring Omission

What it lacks, in a truly unacceptable way, is any moral dimension or deeper insight to offset the protracted, admiring visuals of Gein's depraved acts. The show presents his vibrant fantasy life and positions him as a man at the mercy of his controlling parent and an accomplice with dark interests. The implied message seems to be: How could a mentally ill man resist? In one scene, the novelist theorizes that without seeing certain images, Gein would have remained an unremarkable local.

Breaking from Past Success

One might contend that a show from this stable – known for sleek, exaggerated aesthetics – is an unlikely source for deep psychological exploration. But previous works like The People v OJ Simpson offered sharp analysis on media and justice. The Assassination of Gianni Versace explored fame and culture. The Clinton scandal series examined systemic sexism. Thus, it is possible, and the producer has succeeded before.

The Final Verdict

Yet not in this case. The Ed Gein Story feels like a commercialization of a lesser-known criminal case. It demands sympathy for the man behind the masks without offering genuine insight into his transformation. Aside from the reductive "religious mother" explanation, there is little effort to understand the creation or avert similar tragedies. It is nothing but voyeuristic pandering to the basest instincts of the audience. The Nazi scenes do have excellent cinematography, though.